CRA is following up on improperly claimed CERB and other benefits

Article content material

This week, the Canada Income Company started sending out Notices of Redetermination, advising some Canadians who might have obtained COVID profit funds for which they could haven’t certified, of money owed which were established on their CRA accounts. This follows the Notices of Debt that Employment and Social Growth Canada started sending out in November 2021 to numerous profit recipients who obtained an advance fee of $2,000 of the Canada Emergency Response Profit (CERB) in 2020.

Article content material

You’ll recall that as a part of its response to the pandemic, the federal government used an attestation-based course of to offer earnings assist to thousands and thousands of Canadians, which relied on people figuring out for themselves in the event that they had been eligible for advantages based mostly on the established standards. However, it seems that not all who utilized had been in the end eligible to obtain advantages, both as a consequence of an sincere misunderstanding of the principles, or, in some instances, merely making use of for CERB, or its alternative the Canada Restoration Profit (CRB), regardless of not assembly the qualification standards, whereas hoping the federal government by no means adopted up.

However now the federal government is, certainly, following up. When you obtained a letter, however nonetheless imagine that you just’re eligible for these funds, you need to contact the CRA and supply any further data required to validate your declare. When you do have to repay again advantages obtained, the CRA and ESDC have acknowledged that their name brokers will work with people on a case-by-case foundation to search out options to your state of affairs, together with making versatile fee preparations. There will likely be no curiosity or penalties utilized to any repayments.

Article content material

In the meantime, we proceed to see taxpayers going to Federal Court docket, difficult the CRA’s resolution to disclaim COVID-related advantages. These instances have had blended success. Final month, I shared the story of the Quebec taxi driver who went to court to problem the CRA’s resolution to disclaim him the CRB. This follows a reported case a month earlier of the tutor who allegedly earned $5,250 of income, in money, and was denied his declare for the CERB. There was additionally a case earlier this yr wherein but another taxpayer was in court challenging the CRA’s decision, which concluded he was ineligible for the CRB in 2020 as a result of he didn’t earn $5,000 of earnings within the prior yr.

A brand new reported case, simply out final month, concerned a taxpayer who was difficult the CRA’s resolution to disclaim him the Canada Restoration Caregiving Profit (CRCB). The CRCB offered a $500-per-week taxable profit, for as much as 44 weeks, for somebody who needed to miss work to look after a member of the family in sure circumstances as a consequence of COVID. It was accessible beginning Sept. 27, 2020 and ended simply final week, on Might 7, 2022.

Article content material

To qualify for the CRCB, you needed to be a Canadian resident, current in Canada, and a minimum of 15 years of age with a legitimate SIN. You have to have earned a minimum of $5,000 of (self-) employment earnings in 2019, 2020, 2021, or within the 12-month interval previous to the applying date. As well as, it’s essential to have been unable to work for a minimum of 50 per cent of your usually scheduled work week since you needed to deal with a member of the family for numerous causes as a consequence of COVID-19. For instance, you might have cared on your little one below 12 years outdated, or one other member of the family who required supervised care, as a result of their common care was unavailable for causes associated to COVID-19.

In 2020, the taxpayer utilized for the CRCB. He subsequently utilized for added intervals in 2020 and 2021. Following his utility, the CRA adopted up with him on quite a few events requesting additional data, notably documentation evidencing his income, his discount in work and his caregiving duties.

Article content material

In keeping with the CRA officer’s notes, the taxpayer refused to offer the requested paperwork and offered conflicting data over the course of half a dozen cellphone calls. In a single name, the taxpayer claimed to look after his daughter whereas in one other he knowledgeable the officer that he didn’t even have custody of his daughter. In one other name, he claimed that he cared for his father as a consequence of a pre-COVID medical process and that his father lives with him 24 hours a day, whereas in one other name the taxpayer acknowledged his father and mom reside collectively. In yet one more name, the taxpayer claimed to have labored and earned the prescribed minimal earnings, whereas in one other name he admitted to having not labored since 2017. The taxpayer later argued that he was paid $28,150 in money, however the money was not deposited in his checking account, nor was it declared on his tax return.

Article content material

In September 2021, the CRA denied his advantages. The taxpayer then requested a assessment of the CRA resolution which was carried out, with the CRA concluding, as soon as once more, in an October 2021 letter that the taxpayer merely didn’t qualify.

In November 2021, the taxpayer utilized to the Federal Court docket, asking for a judicial assessment as as to whether the CRA’s resolution to disclaim the CRCB was “affordable.” The Crown introduced a movement to strike the taxpayer’s utility.

Article content material

An utility for judicial assessment should set out the grounds to be argued, that means all of the authorized bases and materials information essential to assist the aid sought. The Federal Court docket of Attraction has beforehand set out the apply and procedures for notices of utility for judicial assessment, in addition to motions to strike any functions, saying that “an applicant should set out a ‘exact’ assertion of the aid sought and a ‘full’ and ‘concise’ assertion of the grounds meant to be argued.” Certainly, prior jurisprudence has decided that “merely stating, in a discover, that (the CRA’s) findings are misguided with out explaining why or providing particulars, counts for little or no, if something.”

On condition that the taxpayer’s court docket utility included “no allegation as to how the CRA resolution below assessment is unreasonable and that it accommodates no materials information pertaining to the choice,” the choose used her judicial discretion to strike the taxpayer’s utility for judicial assessment, that means the case won’t be continuing to trial. She additionally awarded prices to the Crown.

[email protected]

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto.