A majority of Individuals are experiencing mistrust in our elections in the USA in accordance with latest polling information. What must be easy counting machines are hidden behind extravagant coding, “mental property” claims, and possession by complicated personal fairness corporations.
The federal authorities hasn’t up to date their pointers for these machines and their “safety” since years earlier than the iPhone was in existence. And now we discover out that one federal company may very well be fabricating paperwork to cowl for his or her inadequacies. This shouldn’t be a partisan problem: these machines should go.
The truth that the Elections Help Fee Fee (EAC) didn’t have a legitimate accreditation certificates for voting machine testing laboratory Professional V&V previous to the 2020 election has been disclosed in quite a few courtroom circumstances and testimony to state legislatures. But, by some means, they appear to disregard this unbelievable truth. The Gateway Pundit reported on this previously whereas additionally speaking in regards to the battle of curiosity that exists with these “testing” labs being paid by the businesses they’re “testing” for.
However final month, a brand new discovery was made by residents investigating the disastrous 2020 election that was riddled with fraud, violations of state and federal legal guidelines, chain of custody violations, and destruction of proof. Citizen investigators Kevin Moncla and David Cross found that not solely was Professional V&V not correctly accredited, the coverup to make it look like they have been concerned the falsification of paperwork by EAC Testing and Certification Director, Jerome Lovato.
In accordance with an official criticism submitted by Moncla and Cross to the Georgia State Elections Board in August, their investigation “has uncovered proof which calls into query, not solely the validity of Georgia’s voting system certification, however the accreditation of the Voting System Testing Laboratory, and the credibility of the EAC itself.”
In accordance with their official complaint (“the Complaint”):
- Professional V&V’s EAC Voting System Testing Lab Accreditation expired in 2017.
- EAC officers have falsely misrepresented the accreditation standing of
Professional V&V and have gone to extraordinary lengths to hide the actual fact
that Professional V&V’s accreditation was expired for an prolonged interval of
time.- Information and evaluation strongly recommend that the EAC fabricated
paperwork on behalf of Professional V&V then posted these paperwork
on the EAC web site. Seemingly this was finished in an effort to
make it seem as if the required paperwork had been well timed
submitted. - Following the 2020 Normal Election, the EAC falsely claimed
that the explanation Professional V&V’s accreditation certificates(s) had not
been issued was due to:- Delays brought on by COVID-19
- Administrative Error
- Accreditation wasn’t revoked
- Georgia’s present voting system was not licensed in accordance with
the Assist America Vote Act. The voting system Georgia bought
was not examined by an EAC accredited Voting System Testing Lab as
required thereby rendering the EAC certification invalid based mostly upon
the established necessities.
- Information and evaluation strongly recommend that the EAC fabricated
The importance of the EAC fabricating paperwork on behalf of Professional V&V not solely additional exacerbates the general public mistrust on this federal group, it additionally calls into query whether or not the Dominion machines in Georgia have been ever licensed, seeing as how they’re model new and have been by no means used previous to Professional V&V’s final certificates of accreditation.
In accordance with the Grievance:
On September 11, 2019, an legal professional representing the Coalition for Good Governance in a
pending federal lawsuit (Curling v. Raffensperger) despatched an e-mail to Ryan Germany, Normal
Counsel for the Georgia Secretary of State. The e-mail inquired in regards to the accreditation
standing of Professional V&V who had examined Georgia’s Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5A(G) voting
system that the EAC had subsequently licensed. Particularly, the e-mail states partially:
“3. Lastly, we perceive that Professional V+V served because the testing agent for the
EAC and likewise to supply some purposeful testing for the State’s certification
of the BMD system. We’ve got been unable to discover a present EAC certificates
of accreditation for Professional V+V. The certificates appear to have been eliminated
from the EAC web site, and the most recent ones we will find expired in 2017.
Are you able to please advise whether or not Professional V+V is an accredited testing lab,
licensed by the EAC?
Below the Professional V&V data web page on the EAC web site, there was a doc posted 6 days after the Ryan Germany letter referenced above. The file with the filename “Professional V&V letter of settlement.pdf” ought to nonetheless be capable to be downloaded. This doc, not like the March 2020 one discovered here, is lacking a date and a signature, as required by the EAC.
One other uncommon discrepancy with the seemingly fabricated doc is the creation of the header. When the header for the “2015” doc created on 9/17/2019 by “jlovato” is opened in Photoshop, it’s truly two separate photographs as if somebody minimize and pasted it collectively, not like the three/10/2020 header that can also be pictured under:
And the final obtrusive discrepancy, apart from the misspelling of their handle on their “official letterhead” (“boulevards” as an alternative of “boulevard”), is the handle listed for the EAC. Even when this doc was truly created in 2015 as they declare and never 9/17/2019 because the metadata evidences, the handle for the EAC is wrong. In accordance with the Grievance, the handle for the EAC modified to 1335 East West Freeway, MD on October 22, 2013, two years earlier than the “authentic” date and 6 years earlier than the precise created date.
The EAC went on to assert that there was a discrepancy in accreditations on account of “COVID-19”. Properly, clearly there wasn’t COVID-19 in 2017 when their most up-to-date accreditation certificates on the EAC web site was posted. And because the accreditation is simply 2 years, the brand new accreditation would have expired February 2019, which is a full 12 months earlier than the pandemic prompted any “excellent circumstances” in the USA.
So the EAC shouldn’t be solely lacking essentially the most present accreditations of Professional V&V, they might even be lacking their 2019 renewal documentation as nicely. Mr. Lovato tries to play semantics in his memo about this subject by stating that “The EAC has by no means voted to revoke the accreditation of Professional V&V.” Nobody is making that declare. We’re claiming it expired. Expiration and revocation will not be the identical. One is computerized and the opposite is a handbook motion taken, respectively.
We no longer solely have enough proof that Professional V&V was not accredited for the 2020 election or since Feb. 2017, which additionally implies not a single machine examined by them in all the United States must be legitimate, however we additionally now have proof that the EAC Director of Testing and Certification Jerome Lovato fabricated paperwork on behalf of Professional V&V to retroactively cowl their proverbial butts.
I consider Mr. Moncla and Mr. Cross summed it up greatest:
As we mark the EAC’s twentieth 12 months, we should acknowledge that the EAC has didn’t develop
and keep voting system testing pointers, didn’t oversee the accreditation of testing
labs, and failed to check our nation’s voting techniques to a remotely cheap customary. The
truth is that EAC has miserably didn’t carry out not solely its core mission, however all missions
for its complete existence.
The actions of the EAC as detailed herein lengthen far past mere failure. The EAC has
fabricated a fraudulent document for Professional V&V and has repeatedly, knowingly, and deliberately
misrepresented the expired accreditation standing of a Voting Methods Testing Laboratory to
the American individuals. The EAC’s misleading practices have fostered a false sense of safety
and materially violated their duties underneath the HAVA in each letter and spirit of the
legislation.
The inherit customary of any established establishment or business doesn’t exist with voting
techniques in the USA. There isn’t a benchmark, no unbiased methodology of testing, no
oversight, and subsequently there isn’t a different however for the States to carry out their very own due diligence in testing our voting techniques.
Wherefore, the Georgia State Election Board should instantly droop use of the
Dominion voting techniques till an intensive, evaluation by a panel of unbiased consultants might be
carried out.
I extremely suggest you learn the report in its entirety and subscribe to the substack here. Hat tip Kevin Moncla and David Cross.
