Late final month, The Gateway Pundit published a story concerning the testimony of a former voting machine tester, Clay Parikh, who was an professional witness in a lawsuit calling for Arizona to stop use of digital voting machines. Earlier this month, TGP had the chance to sit down and interview Mr. Parikh. He additionally gave an announcement on the Mike Lindell Second of Fact Summit here.
Yesterday, nonetheless, the trouble to ban digital voting machines with tremendous secret supply code and personal fairness agency possession got here to a screeching halt in Lake v. Hobbs. The case was dismissed, as soon as once more, alleging that Kari Lake didn’t have standing to carry the case. The entire resolution may be learn here.
In one of many plaintiff’s allegations, they claimed that the election tools should go endure “thorough testing by unbiased, impartial specialists” in response to ARS 16-442(A)(B). Whereas Lake V Hobbs doesn’t take care of the 2020 election, it’s value noting that Arizona machines in 2020 weren’t licensed by an accredited testing lab. Moreover, it should even be famous that these testing laboratories have a obvious battle of curiosity in certifying these machines. They’re paid to do that work by the producer of the machines they’re certifying. And to that time, the Pro V&V website states its mission:
“Since our founding in 2011, we now have at all times had one focus: our purchasers. Professional V&V exists to assist its purchasers adjust to rules in techniques and software program testing in probably the most environment friendly {and professional} method potential, and will at all times be devoted to verifying your merchandise to your satisfaction.”
TRENDING: President Trump Releases One of His Best and Shortest Statements Yet
In Clay Parikh’s testimony, talked about above, it’s steered that the testing these machines undergo is nothing greater than a proverbial verify within the field to instill a false sense of safety that the machines are functioning correctly.
Mr. Parikh was in a position to hack each Dominion and ES&S machines in a matter of minutes. He was stopped, nonetheless, from going additional throughout his penetration testing that will have revealed the power to “manipulate statistical information on the machine.” It could be dangerous enterprise for these testing labs to show the paying buyer’s product is inadequately safe or intentionally weak. This can be a battle of curiosity.
Moreover, there’s proof to counsel that even with satisfactory testing that passes EAC certification, there’s nonetheless not solely potential, however precise occurrences of “inaccurate code” in some way making its method into the software program. Living proof: Williamson, TN. According to a report released earlier this year by the EAC:
However wait. This identical report states:
How may “EAC licensed” software program have “inaccurate code” on it? Smoke and mirrors? Conflicts of curiosity? Whereas this isn’t the identical machine utilized in Arizona, it’s Democracy Suite software program in Maricopa on Dominion machines.
Mr. Parikh additionally confirmed, by the protection counsel’s personal redirect, that machines can and do hook up with the web and that those that “can’t” nonetheless have the means to take action by the motherboard in addition to open ports. The protection counsel additionally revealed that the Democracy Suite software program was “rewritten” (protection legal professional’s personal phrases) in 2018. This can be a contentious level as a result of the one firm that has licensed Dominion machines in Arizona was not accredited in 2018, 2019, or 2020. So was the “rewritten” Dominion software program truly licensed not solely in Arizona, however wherever in the US that it was utilized?
Within the Plaintiff’s allegations, it’s also talked about {that a} “third required audit – a hand count- takes place” and that “representatives of the political events…randomly choose two % of the polling places…and rely all of the ballots by hand.” However in response to testimony from the hearings in Maricopa in November, 2020, this wasn’t carried out correctly. Dominion ran the studies and the containers to be audited had been “chosen” eight days earlier than they had been even carried out tabulating the votes. What number of tens, possibly tons of of hundreds of ballots weren’t topic to a random choice for this take a look at?
In what’s one other absolute obvious battle of curiosity, in 2020, previous to the Arizona Audit by Cyber Ninjas, Maricopa Co. ordered an “audit” by Professional V&V and SLI Compliance. Professional V&V, as we all know, is the corporate that, in an enormous battle of curiosity, is paid by the seller to certify the seller’s software program to “their satisfaction.” And now, after an accusation of incorrect doing, they’re given entry to conduct an “audit” to verify their very own work of which they’d be culpable if one thing had been to occur. Sarcastically, after the Cyber Ninja’s performed their audit, there have been discoveries of quite a few deleted information, question bombs of 37,000 login makes an attempt that reset the “log in” databases to cover “log in makes an attempt” in the course of the election, and far more.
Primarily based on the above statements, we all know that #1 means little to nothing after Clay Parikh’s admissions, the conflicts of curiosity in who funds these testing labs, and the EAC report the place “licensed software program” was found to have “inaccurate code” that severely impacted the counts. #2 can be robust to find out as a result of, as Parikh said, he was prevented from going additional throughout testing to disclose methods to “manipulate statistical information” on the machines and within the 2020 Arizona Audit, there have been over 1,000,000 deleted, “archived” information. #3 is not possible to inform as a result of the “Particular Grasp” that was given entry to the Routers and Splunk logs wasn’t trying on the identical community configuration of the 2020 election and his “investigators” are topic to an NDA and can’t disclose what they discovered. #4 Logic and Accuracy testing additionally confirmed correct pre-election numbers in Cherokee Co, KS, in Antrim Co, MI, in Dekalb Co, GA (2022), and Lapeer Co, MI, simply to call just a few.
Within the Evaluation portion of the Decide’s resolution, he states:
It’s odd to make these claims whereas additionally not adequately checking for such intrusions. The deleted “archived” information that was not handed over to the Cyber Ninja’s in the course of the Maricopa Audit, in addition to the splunk logs and routers that had been by no means handed over are paramount in proving any of the factors listed by the Secretary of State within the above assertion. However the deleted “archived” information had been by no means handed over and the routers/splunk logs had been “analyzed” in secret and cloaked by NDAs because of an extremely lopsided settlement between the Arizona Senate and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and never by the contracted auditors.
The underside line is that this: there isn’t a court docket in the US that has had the center to listen to a case on elections and the vulnerabilities of those machines and make a ruling based mostly on proof. This has been exemplified on the US Supreme Court docket in Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al, federal courts in GA, and state/district courts additionally in Fulton Co, Ga, Antrim Co, MI, Delaware Co, PA, Wisconsin, and Maricopa Co, AZ, to call just a few.
