Robert Barnes is a Los Angeles lawyer. TGP has reported on Robert the “large slayer” through the years. As a part of Alex Jones’ authorized staff, Robert Barnes has embraced the view that the Sandy Hook lawsuits introduced towards Jones are a part of a conspiracy to cripple the First Modification.
In a latest interview with David Freiheit (Viva Frei), Barnes provides the best explanations of what’s actually happening. This dialogue begins on the 1:35:00 minute mark of this video and lasts 12 minutes. Under are key interview feedback made by lawyer Barnes, some are flat-out gorgeous.
Barnes says the true grifters of Sandy Hook are Elizabeth Williamson of The New York Instances and lawyer Chris Mattei who represents the households. Williamson has made a profession out of Sandy Hook with nearly 40 articles simply this 12 months. Chasing this story for a decade has put her on TV, on radio, in books, and so forth. A whole lot of articles have additionally been revealed by the NYT because the 2012 incident. This defamation trial is being held in Connecticut Superior Courtroom by Decide Barbara Bellis.
1:35:45 – Barnes explains: Alex Jones nearly by no means denied Sandy Hook occurred. (On his present) he answered two callers’ questions. It wasn’t tied to any promoting in any respect, at any time. Why is Jones not allowed to elucidate this (in court docket)? None of his monetary success had something to do with Sandy Hook.
The principle proof of that is two issues. Over 99% of the whole lot InfoWars revealed and broadcast really mentioned that Sandy Hook occurred. Their Sandy Hook protection was lower than 1% of all protection throughout the time-frame. These are vital details that inform you if he made cash or not. Should you imputed worth to it, this could be 1/one thousandth of 1%. The plaintiff’s have all his monetary data, the dates he made these statements, and you could possibly tie it in (as profiting). So why haven’t they?
1:36:54 – As a result of in case you assessment this information, and I’ve, he didn’t generate income. Sandy Hook was a internet loser for Jones. They’ll’t present any connection that Jones made cash off of it. Actually, if you take a look at the main points, difficult Sandy Hook value him cash, and it value him supporters. Why are these details not popping out? As a result of Decide Bellis mentioned Jones CAN NOT inform the jury how little he lined Sandy Hook. He CAN NOT inform the jury how he didn’t generate income off Sandy Hook. He CAN NOT inform the jury the way it value him, greater than it helped him. He CAN NOT inform the jury how 99% of InfoWars protection mentioned Sandy Hook occurred.
1:38:20 – They need to construct a lie for the jury to purchase, with a view to get an enormous test, for issues that don’t even relate to compensatory damages. The Plaintiffs are allowed to current all of the proof that recommend he’s wealthy and well-known off of Sandy Hook. However Jones will not be allowed to elucidate he’s in chapter, didn’t generate income off Sandy Hook, and infrequently lined it. Why is he not allowed (to say this in entrance of the jury) – as a result of the reality would result in a low verdict.
1:39:14 – This can be a pretend case, about supposedly pretend information. You have got a corrupt choose and a rogue ambulance chasing Plaintiff’s lawyer, attempting to inform a mislead the world, with assist of liberals like Elizabeth Williamson of the New York Instances, who’s the true one who has grifted and made cash off Sandy Hook. You already know who the most important cash makers are off of Sandy Hook? The Media. The media is aware of each time they glamorize a mass shooter, that it will increase the chance of one other mass taking pictures. And the media need it to occur. As a result of they line their pockets with it. And the Democrat politicians in Connecticut, aligned with this corrupt court docket system and lawyer, additionally make political achieve off of it. As a result of it’s their excuse to remove all people’s weapons.
There’s an incentive for the media and Democratic politicians. They’re weaponizing this case, partly, to encourage one other mass taking pictures to occur. They need it, as a result of they get wealthy off it, and get political energy off it. That’s the fact they don’t need anyone speaking about, as a result of that’s what Alex Jones was speaking about (again then).
1:41:25 – Barnes explains why Decide Bellis banned Jones from making essential disclosures in court docket. “Largely it’s for them to have the ability to inform a mislead the jury, to put in writing an enormous test, when none of it’s related to the trial in any respect. The worry is that if jury hears about Jones chapter….they hear punishment, they hear struggling, they don’t see a brilliant wealthy man getting highly effective off of Sandy Hook. It utterly negates the Plaintiff’s narrative.
1:42:10 – Should you watch that (courtroom) examination, the Plaintiff’s lawyer was falsely attempting to suggest that every one of Jones cash and success….that he’s at present very profitable, and all of it comes from Sandy Hook. Each of that are lies that this corrupt court docket needs the jury to consider are true. The choose really ordered Alex Jones couldn’t give significant solutions, he can solely reply with “sure,” “no,” or “I don’t know.” If you wish to see how to not be a lawyer, watch this political hack Chris Mattei in court docket. This was not solely theater, it was dangerous theater, a nasty present trial. Even civil legislation individuals which can be hostile to Alex Jones are saying they’ll’t justify this choose’s conduct, can’t justify Chris Mattei’s conduct.
1:44:56 – Barnes makes clear that Jones by no means went to the victims’ dwelling, by no means interviewed them, and solely talked about one title in passing. That is in stark distinction to what others have achieved, and proceed to do. That is so dangerous, Elizabeth Williamson of the New York Instances likes to grift off of Sandy Hook. She likes to generate income off these individuals’s ache. All the things they accused Alex Jones of, is who these plaintiff legal professionals are, is who Williamson is. They find it irresistible when these dad and mom undergo horribly as a result of they’ll simply go cha ching, cha ching, with interview after interview, with large pharma advertisements in between. Simply filling their pockets.
1:45:36 – This complete case has been an publicity of confession by way of projection. What they accuse Alex Jones of is strictly what Elizabeth Williamson is responsible of. It’s what the New York Instances is responsible of. It’s what CNN is responsible of. And Williamson goes out and makes a completely false assertion. She mentioned Jones was not known as to the stand by his personal lawyer as a result of of how horrible Jones was on the stand. This was an entire fabrication, a complete lie. Additionally, Jones has repeatedly apologized to the household’s, however gained’t apologize to the ambulance chasing Plaintiff’s lawyer.
1:47:50 – What Jones says outdoors the courtroom a few court docket, I’ve by no means heard of that ever being related throughout a trial, ever in my life. It has no relevance to compensatory damages. Jones had referred to Decide Bellis as a “tyrant”. Whereas on the witness stand, Mattei requested Jones if he refers to everybody he doesn’t like as a tyrant. Jones replied “Nope, solely those who act like tyrants”. Barnes explains the ramifications of corrupt actions by these like Decide Bellis and lawyer Mattei. They instill doubt within the justice system itself. This results in undermining our perception within the justice system of our personal authorities….and diminishes confidence within the final result.
Barnes on the Mission Veritas Case:
1:24:45 – Barnes additionally discusses the Mission Veritas case on the 1:24:45 mark. Barnes explains: Should you’re a Democrat and your crimes get uncovered, you get to sue the opposite individual for exposing your crimes, and the federal government will examine the one who uncovered the crimes, and attempt to put them in jail. That’s the brand new American authorized system below the Biden administration. He suggests if we need to drain the swamp, the primary cease is shutting down and disbanding the D.C. courts.
