Taxpayer dinged with a taxable benefit for taking a business trip

Article content material

Your employer sends you on a enterprise journey. It occurs to be to Cancun, Mexico. You give a presentation, schmooze with purchasers who promote your merchandise and attend quite a lot of social actions, together with a catamaran cruise. Years later, you get hit with a taxable employment profit since you went on that enterprise journey.

Article content material

If that consequence appears ludicrous, you could be focused on a current resolution by the Court docket of Quebec, after a BMO Insurance coverage worker was assessed a taxable employment profit by Revenu Québec (RQ) of $1,872 in respect of a enterprise journey he took in 2015. Earlier than going into the small print of the case, nevertheless, let’s overview the final rule relating to taxable employment advantages.

Below the Earnings Tax Act, workers should embrace of their revenue the worth of any advantages of any type acquired by the worker “in respect of, in the midst of, or by advantage of his or her employment.”

In figuring out whether or not an worker should embrace the worth of a profit acquired, the Canada Revenue Agency (and RQ) appears at three figuring out components: Does the profit provides the worker an financial benefit? Is the profit measurable and quantifiable? And does the profit primarily profit the worker, versus primarily benefiting the employer?

Article content material

The taxpayer in query right here has been an worker of BMO for the previous decade, the place he serves because the director of enterprise growth. BMO presents quite a lot of private insurance coverage merchandise to its prospects throughout Canada. Reasonably than make use of brokers or monetary advisers to promote its merchandise on to the general public, it depends on a community of managing common brokers (MGAs), which act as intermediaries between the insurer and brokers and advisers. BMO’s main relationship with brokers and advisers is thru MGAs, making it important that it has visibility with them, particularly by collaborating of their actions.

The taxpayer’s duties have been to handle relationships with MGAs, work with sellers and advisers, prepare them on BMO merchandise, and customarily encourage them to promote BMO merchandise to their purchasers.

Article content material

In August 2015, BMO was approached to sponsor an Elite Congress to be held in Cancun. The convention introduced collectively the MGA’s top-performing brokers and advisers. The sponsorship included airfare for one individual and every week’s resort keep. By sponsoring the convention, an organization is entitled to make a presentation about its merchandise. BMO’s resolution to take part in all these conferences is predicated on the enterprise quantity (or potential quantity) of a given MGA. BMO participates in roughly 5 conventions per 12 months, with every MGA internet hosting one conference each two to a few years.

Since this explicit MGA had been a serious enterprise accomplice of BMO for a few years, the insurer noticed the convention as alternative to achieve visibility with brokers and agreed to sponsor it. It determined to ship the taxpayer to Cancun to symbolize BMO.

Article content material

The convention, the one one the taxpayer attended in 2015, included various actions, some have been instantly associated to work, resembling an organization sales space and coaching classes, and a few have been numerous leisure actions. The taxpayer gave a presentation about BMO’s merchandise, and took part in as many actions as doable with purchasers, together with a catamaran outing, and had numerous meals with brokers and advisers. Within the meantime, he continued to hold on his regular employment actions resembling responding to e-mails and returning telephone calls.

Upon his return to Canada, the taxpayer despatched a “very detailed e mail” describing all of the conferences he had had with advisers or brokers, and the potential that resulted from them. His boss expressed appreciation for the event work he did in Cancun.

Article content material

The next 12 months, the MGA was the topic of a taxable profit audit associated to the Cancun convention wherein RQ divided the attendees into three classes: MGA workers, the brokers and advisers who earned their place by qualifying in a gross sales contest, and representatives of the insurance coverage firms, together with the taxpayer.

RQ concluded that for the reason that MGA workers have been despatched on the journey in the midst of their regular employment actions, the journey didn’t represent a taxable employment profit for them. Conversely, RQ decided that the journey constituted “leisure” for the successful advisers, and it assessed a taxable profit equal to 100 per cent of the worth of the journey.

However for workers attending on behalf of the sponsors, RQ took the place that solely 37.5 per cent of the journey was for enterprise functions, and the rest was a taxable profit. In consequence, RQ in Might 2018 reassessed the taxpayer for a taxable profit for 62.5 per cent of the worth of the journey, or $1,872.

Article content material

The taxpayer objected to the evaluation and took the matter to court docket, arguing that his attendance on the Cancun convention ought to have been handled as a enterprise journey in its entirety, and never labeled, in any approach, as a taxable profit.

The choose who reviewed the case famous that prior case regulation acknowledges that whereas sure actions on all these enterprise journeys might, certainly, be “entertaining in nature,” this doesn’t stop the first function of the journey being enterprise growth. Moreover, the choose added, it was “not applicable to make a strict mathematical calculation to find out the proportion of leisure actions within the context of a given convention or journey. Reasonably, one should take a look at the general function of attending the convention.”

Article content material

In consequence, the choose concluded that no portion of the price of the journey ought to have been a taxable profit to the BMO worker, since his participation on the journey was neither an award nor a prize. He went to the convention alone, it was not thought of or counted by BMO as a trip, there was an expectation he can be actively concerned in assembly with advisers and brokers, and he continued to handle his day-to-day employment duties even whereas he was away.

The taxpayer was additionally awarded prices.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. [email protected] 

_____________________________________________________________

 For extra tales like this one, sign up for the FP Investor publication.

______________________________________________________________