Visitor submit by Techno Fog through Substack.
We requested the FBI for the Jeffrey Epstein interview transcripts.
The FBI response: offering the Epstein information would intrude with regulation enforcement proceedings.
Both the FBI is mendacity or one thing is up. (Wager on FBI lies…)https://t.co/izwxxdo3KV
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 9, 2022
Your humble creator, as promised, is concerned in litigation to extract information from the federal authorities. It’s simple to speak about present occasions. The tougher half is suing federal businesses for documentation of their wrongdoing.
This includes initiating FOIA requests, that are hardly ever answered rapidly or fully. Out of our 75+ FOIA requests from this previous yr, just one was answered rapidly and absolutely. A small miracle.
That was the place we obtained CDC e-mails disclosing how they modified the definition of “vaccine” due to the efficacy issues with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. It’s a must-read if you haven’t seen it already (even when it obtained us wrongly flagged on the Carnegie Mellon College COVID-19 “misinformation” watchlist).
Then there are the information we should combat for.
One improvement we are able to disclose is our effort to acquire the FBI’s information on Jeffrey Epstein. We made a easy request: hand over all FBI interviews with Epstein. We all know these information are on the market, as we had been the primary to report that Epstein had been a supply for the FBI. (It was later confirmed that Epstein cooperated on a Bear Stearns investigation.)
Wait. Was pedophile Jeffrey Epstein an informant for Mueller’s FBI?
From the 5/24/18 FBI Vault launch: “Epstein has additionally supplied info to the FBI as agreed upon.”
Is that why he escaped severe expenses for molesting over twenty women? pic.twitter.com/K4suAumD85
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 24, 2018
However we’re not satisfied that was the one time Epstein spoke with the FBI. There have been different hints and rumors that he labored with the US authorities to get better stolen funds. Thus the FOIA request.
How did the FBI reply? Not by denying the existence of any information.
As a substitute, the FBI is hiding behind FOIA’s regulation enforcement exemption, stating that the manufacturing of the Epstein information would intrude with ongoing regulation enforcement investigations:
“The information conscious of your request are regulation enforcement information; there’s a pending or potential regulation enforcement continuing related to those responsive information, and launch of the data might fairly be anticipated to intrude with enforcement proceedings.”
We’re exceedingly uncertain that the discharge of the Epstein information would “intrude with enforcement proceedings.” Ghislaine Maxwell has been convicted and Epstein is useless. The one potential tie could be from a grand jury investigation into “different attainable co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein.” However that was from the summer season of 2020 and we rightly assume no expenses had been introduced towards whoever was being investigated.
Learn the remainder at Techno Fog on Substack.
